Skip to main content

I've been an offset pit smoker for about the last five years. I've owned an FEC100 for less than a month. So far there are quite a few differences that I can attest too, but I'm wondering what are biggest differences (if any) that the rest of you that have experienced on an FEC VS a different type of smoker? Of course we all know that the ability to sleep and or do anything while your FEC is full of product is most likely the biggest difference.

I cooked two large slabs of spares yesterday. The biggest difference that we noticed was the final product was way more salty than in the past. I'm going to guess that this has to do with a much cleaner smoke VS the heavier smoke flavor that my offset adds to meat. I can remember when I was altering my rubs and not being able to taste any difference in flavor on my old pit because it was such a heavy smoke flavor. Kind of stinks that I have all my rubs/recipes that are geared toward a heavier/smokier product, but I guess it gives me all summer to come up with some new rubs and ides.

Anyone thoughts from those who have had a similar experience?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Yep,clean fire/taste is a big difference.

Amazing, this seems to be a plus in the judging tent. Cool

On big cuts,the clean fire may give you a little less smokering.

Since you can't taste smokering,and it is not to be judged,same effect in the judges tent.

You probably are also amazed by how little fuel,compared to a logburner. Big Grin

And of course it is much more handsome and we know gals go for a man with a mini stickburner. Cool
Yeah, the fuel difference is wonderful. Here's a pic from 60lbs of butt that I cooked for an event this weekend. Can't say enough about the FEC. Cooked the butts for almost 12 hours total, opened the door 4 times. Once to load, once to un-load and twice to mop. Unbelievable!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_1461
Why thank ya sir. I use to be religious about cooking fat side up for the self basting aspect of it. No more in the FEC. I can get that sweet finish on the meaty side and not even need to worry about drying 'em out. And I'm still waiting for the thrill of not having to babysit my fire to wear off. I'm beginning to wonder if it was just the booze that made me enjoy adjusting baffles, moving meat around and throwing logs on the fire for 12 hours?
quote:
Originally posted by 2Ks Smokn:
I'm beginning to wonder if it was just the booze that made me enjoy adjusting baffles, moving meat around and throwing logs on the fire for 12 hours?


Well the communical aspect of a big smoker, big fire and lots of smoke is one aspect you'll miss not having a log burner.

Never heard someone say their food tasted saltier, so it will be an interesting thread, since you've got a specific flavor profile/experience you're trying to match.

Not sure, but you could be right that before you had so much smoke on it, that it "hid" the saltiness.

You could try more time on lower temp for more smoke. Try 180 for 3 or 4 hours; then up to a finish temp. Or change the wood, maybe a stronger wood?
Yeah, not sure about the whole salty issue. It wasn't that way at all with the butts. The ribs definitely grabbed a hold of some salt from somewhere. Could have just been a mistake on the rub-maker's part? As far as the log burner goes.. I still have mine for that reason. I spent 5 years mastering that pit, and it is fun sitting around it and cooking. Just not nearly as easy or as consistent. Thanks for the "more smoke" advice. I recently got a new controller for it and unfortunately it now only has a "smoke" setting and then jumps to 225. Smoke seems to top out at 160 - 165ish, but I get the concept.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×