Skip to main content

How many of you smokette owners wish you'd of upsized to the model 50? Or are you completely satisfied with the size of your unit, er smoker? It seems to me that these units have a smaller usable area than the actual size due to heat diffs from top to bottom, rendering the bottom rack almost useless.

As a prospective owner I'd appreciate a sanity check from you more seasoned owners. Also whether or not you wish you'd have bought a bigger unit from the get-go. Is it still practical to cook just a single chunk of meat in the 50?

I'm not a caterer, but I sometimes like to cook for large groups (family, church, neighbors, etc).

Thanks.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Some of the folks have chosen to buy a couple of smokettes for almost the price of a 50.

You can cook different products,for different time,at different temps at the same time.

If you do a lot of ribs,the 50 seems to be a little more convenient.

I still use my smokette ,to compliment the 160 size.

I like the more direct heat on the bottom for poultry.

If you have all the racks with butts,the larger can go to the bottom to even out the finish times.

I typically use all three racks when using the smokette.

If you are looking for volume,you can handle up to 30 lbs of butts or briskets overnight.

You have to select a little for shape.

Several slabs of loinbacks in the morning and maybe 15 lbs of chicken parts and 5 lbs of sausage in the afternoon.

You can feed a bunch of folks that way.

Just my $0.02

I'm sure a bunch of folks will have thoughts.
Tom: Your answers are always very thoughtful and VERY complete LOL... all I can add, as a Smokette owner for 4 or 5 years, is that -- if money and the bigger size are not big problems, then go for the 50. The Smokette frankly is big enough to cook a lot of meat, especially through a couple of loads and some good food planning. But, hey, the bigger unit would be nice.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×