Need a quick reply.
Are the cooking times for boneless butts any different than for those with the bone in? I was given two without bones and asked to fix them for lunch tomorrow and am unsure how to plan.
Thanks
Hook
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
I rarely cook them,but seems they take marginally longer.
Not a tremedous difference.
Remember,if they are small,they can take longer per pound than larger butts.
Not a tremedous difference.
Remember,if they are small,they can take longer per pound than larger butts.
Thanks so much Tom.
May I ask one more question? Why do you prefer the bone in? Is it a flavor issue? And if so, would I be heads up to use the boneless for something else and get a couple with bones to fix for tomorrow? Don't want to disappoint the group.
Hook
May I ask one more question? Why do you prefer the bone in? Is it a flavor issue? And if so, would I be heads up to use the boneless for something else and get a couple with bones to fix for tomorrow? Don't want to disappoint the group.
Hook
I like to be able to wiggle the bone for my doneness test.
It also seems to feel different,on the sqeeze for doneness test.
Bonein is usually cheaper,I can trim like I please,I can get rub down along the bone.
I don't feel the bone adds to the flavor,but it could.
I'd just cook them.
You'll do fine.
It also seems to feel different,on the sqeeze for doneness test.
Bonein is usually cheaper,I can trim like I please,I can get rub down along the bone.
I don't feel the bone adds to the flavor,but it could.
I'd just cook them.
You'll do fine.
I'll do 'er. Thanks again.