Smoke Ring + Bark

joe j: sounds like you may be hooked! good luck to ya. paul

Good job, Joe. sounds great!

Are we sure your ST 1500 is the equivalent to the CS 008? Is it insulated the same? Is the steel of the same quality? Does it have the same heating element and thermostat? Is it made in the U.S.A.? etc.-etc.

I only ask because while this forum welcomes users of all brands and types smokers, cookers, grills, etc., I don't think or believe the aim is to promote the others' as being equal. I, for 1, have not seen the 2 smokers compared side by side.

Thanks!

GLH,

I don't think Joe's intention was to "promote the other's as being equal" as your post seems to zero in on.

Joe gave some specific information relating to a cook of a brisket which seems to have turned out very nicely. I've tried the briquet routine, with only a couple briquets and have not achieved a real nice smoke ring. After reading this post, I learned maybe I'll try a few more. You get the idea.

I think all in this forum welcome posts from all users of "similar" type units.

My .02,

C'Nooga

Yes, as C'Nooga said it was just a brief note related to the type of smoker. I would say the SmokinTex 1300 is similar enough to the 008 to warrant a direct comparison of cooking technique.

I am new here but have seen alot of posts questioning bark/smoke ring compared to traditional smokers and wanted to let those lurkers who are thinking of purchasing a Cookshack or similar that it indeed can be pulled off.

I was more interested in the bark than I was the ring because I love the crispy bits.

quote:

Originally posted by Joe J:
I used 8 oz of hickory with 5 Kingston charcoal pieces.

Congrats on your success.

The cookers will cook exactly the same, as in fact the ST is a knockoff of the CS, both use electric heating elements. There isn't enough wood burning to provide the ring by itself.

The key was the charcoal. We've posted many times in here that charcoal will enhance the smoke ring, so looks like you picked that up. Basically it burns different and provides nitrates/nitrites different than a chip of wood.

WOW...8 oz of hickory? Is that a typo? I don't think I've ever used more than 4 oz and THAT was more smoke flavor than I wanted. CS recommends approximately 2-4oz per 10# of meat, if I remember correctly. Is that just the difference in the two manufacturers?

Just curious.

Rick in CO

Well, I do like it REALLY smokey. I've been smoking for years on about 5 different smokers (New Braunfels offset, Weber Smokey Mountain, Great Smokey Mountain, Alton Brown's flower pot smoker from Good Eats, etc.) and the 8oz I used was just about perfect for me. I also left all of the fat on the brisket so only one side really had any smoke contact.

I don't think there is that much difference. The SmokinTex book says to use the same 2-4 oz per 10lb of meat not to exceed 8oz.

I'll use 8+ oz. on butts and brisket as well, with a mix of wood, not 100% hickory. I like my smoke flavor I guess. Joe J., how does the bark from a Cookshacked brisket compare to the other cookers you've used? Thanks in advance- Brian

I'd easily put it right up there with the best. I usually try and foil/cooler mine for at least a couple of hours. This levels the playing field a bit. I'm a big fan of bark, so I was sceptical while I waited on the first one to come out.

This is EASILY the best smoker for my type of smoking. As someone said in a previous thread, I had my fun mastering the art of tending a fire for years. I have that sense of accomplishment knowing I can mind a pit for 20 hours if needed. Another bonus is that my wife has really bought into this method. She's always been a fan of BBQ but hated the mess I made with old pits. Always fiddling, spilling the water pan, lots of ash to dispose, big ugly pit on the patio, overly smokey smell from tending the fire, etc. My BBQ budget is slowly increasing each month.

To me the results of using a wood fired pit just aren't worth the effort when comparing the products. I don't eat the skin on chicken so I'm not worried about crispy, which is just about the only thing I can see that this little dream machine can't do.

The only other thing I do miss is basting a bit during the process. I am afraid of opening that door because I've been producing good results with leaving it closed the whole time. I used to baste with a bit of apple juice periodically throughout the cook. The moisture of the CS environment greatly reduces the need for this but my last few cooks could have slighltly benefited from a good baste.

Also, I was a fan of "peeking" in general. I just couldn't wait 20 hours to see how my meal was doing. Maybe I could just find a way to install a wireless webcam.

Two of my friends are already shopping for their CS and I'm already looking to get the larger one.

Okay, I have a question. I've had my 008 for less than a year and continue learning from this forum.

JoeJ suggests that he loaded the wood and charcoal at the beginning and never opened the smoker. Is it possible that the 250 degree initial setting was just enough to kindle the wood and charcoal and that the combination of fuel could have cooked at a significantly higher temp (for a portion of time) than the 200 degree temp he set for the night? I've done a few oven recipes that called for high initial temps (e.g., 450+) and then an extended period at 200 degrees or so. I assumed that the intent there was to get that outer char or sear and then assure a minimun temp is maintained.

The thermostat on the smoker simply regulates when electricity is supplied to the coil -- it certainly won't regulate the temp in the box when wood and/or charcoal are burning. Assuming there is enough oxygen for flame or smolder the temp could greatly exceed that set on a thermostat.

Could this be the source of both the smole ring and the bark?

FL,
That's an interesting point-if Joe monitored the temp of his smoker, he'd know for sure. I get a really good bark on butts (but no smoke ring) when I use my 50, and I have a guru that keeps it at 225 the whole time (no larger temp swings that others notice). I wonder if 250 is high enough to light the wood/charcoal.

I did monitor it for that first hour and saw a few spikes up into the high 260s/low 270s. The unit was sitting in direct afternoon sun and my car's thermo said 106.

Where do you live, JoeJ? Sounds like our weather.

Curious about the charcoal- - -does it have to be one of the bricket type coals, or could a few pieces of lump charcoal achieve the same smoke ring?

Enjoy the rest of your weekends all,
Jeff

I thought it was lump charcoal that is supposed to help create a smoke ring, but why should we care if the smoke ring adds absolutely zilch to the BBQ except some reddish colored meat under the bark? Boggles the mind.

I figure why not if all it takes is a few lumps of coal in there to have a nice smoke ring.

I certainly wouldn't go out of my way to get the ring, but I wouldn't call putting about $.03 worth of charcoal in going out of my way. I know it's asthetics but you might as well give everyone what they expect if you can. It's easier to throw the charcoal in than explain to them why the smoke ring isn't there.

I used regular Kingsford briquets. I've got some lump laying around that I might try next time.

quote:

Originally posted by GLH:
Where do you live, JoeJ? Sounds like our weather.

I'm in Dallas, we haven't had significant rain in about 2 months. Temps have consistently been over 100.

Now my mind is even more boggled, Joe J. Humor me if you will. Why does everyone there expect a smoke ring, and why would an explanation be in order if if they don't get one? Is this a regional or cultural phenomenom? What part of the country are you located? If it happens, it happens, but it makes no difference to anyone here. It is your smoker and your meat. Maybe they would rather go on down the road and pay for a meal. You might also have more cold beer left in the fridge.

I'll speak for that one, you can NOT change perceptions and to the public in general and MOST Q'ers in fact, SR is the gold standard for defining Q.

The public has "learned" over that years, that to be good Q, there has to be a smoke ring. Just watch any cooking show or any juding event and the public talks about it.

I've helped more than a few restaurant people and caters that use electric smokers. They always tell me, people notice and comments when there is not one. The people stop coming because they didn't see a SR -- forget trying to tell them, they don't want an explaination.

You can't educate the public, that good Q isn't defined by a SR, that's just the way the public is.

You have to provide them what they expect if you plan to survive at selling the stuff.